March 2, 2010 at 9:56 pm | Posted in music | Leave a comment
Tags: 6music, baying mob, bbc, bbc asian network, bbc magazines, bbc trust, causes, closure, digital radio, facebook, lily allen, outcry, protest, radio, radio 1, radio 2, Twitter

Gosh, has it really been nearly a fortnight since I last updated Keeping on the Beat? I feel somewhat guilty for having neglected my pet project a little of late, but these are busy times in the maglab; I’ve been making lovely magazines, such as this one, and busily scribbling away at other things – like this, this and this. I’ve not been slacking entirely, I promise.
Last Friday, it was suggested that the BBC might axe their 6Music digital radio station. Naturally, alarm bells began to ring. Today, it was announced officially, as part of a review submitted to the BBC Trust. For the love of Richard Tait, I hope they don’t approve it.
The BBC Asian Network is also in line for closure, and the BBC plans to greatly reduce its online output – which makes sense, because, like, I totally heard that the internet’s not where the future lies. BBC Magazines may also be sold off, but – despite being, at heart, a slave to the printed word – I’m less concerned by this: the main BBC magazines are profitable enough brands that they’ll be snapped up by other companies.
Closing 6Music would, essentially, be a disaster. I’m by no means alone in thinking this – broadcasters, journalists and musicians have all spoken out against the proposed closure. Doubtless many have have been able to express themselves on this topic far more elegantly than I (hell, for once I even agree with what Lily Allen’s saying), but I still feel compelled to add my paltry words to the pool.
6Music represents the BBC’s commitment to independent music. It may not generate the astronomic listening figures of Radio 1 or Radio 2, but that’s the point of it: it caters to a niche audience whose interests may not be catered to by other radio stations. The very reason I originally got a digital radio was because I was sick of having to listen to the likes of Radio 1 – to stations which didn’t play music that I wanted to listen to.
One of the things which I’ve always loved about the BBC is the sheer breadth of its output. Vowing to spend 90 pence from every licence fee pound on programming, while disregarding an area of programming which is obviously close to the hearts of many – if the outcry is anything to go by – is not the way to go. If you’re going to do it, at least do it quickly and as painlessly as possible; have the good grace not to rub salt in the wound by trying to justify it with absurd logic.
Even better, don’t do it at all. 6Music costs around £7 million per year to run; given that Jonathan Ross was on £18 million for three years and is gone from the BBC as of July, the books are already almost balanced. See? If they can do leaps of logic, so can I.
The BBC has admitted that a big enough public outcry could make them change their mind. Write/email to the BBC Trust, join the Facebook group or add a Twibbon to your display picture if you’re on Twitter – make some noise; grab a flaming torch and join the baying mob.
December 14, 2009 at 3:37 pm | Posted in music | 1 Comment
Tags: charts, christmas, facebook, joe mcelderry, killing in the name, number one, rage against the machine, x factor

So, it was Joe. The little one with the bland voice. Actually, that latter point could be applied to any of the X Factor finalists bar Jedward (who, from the truly miniscule amount of the series that I saw, I still maintain should have won on subversion value alone). But anyway, it was Joe who won.
So he’s guaranteed the Christmas number one with his so-inoffensive-that-it-actually-becomes-a-little-bit-offensive cover of Miley Cyrus’s ‘The Climb’, right? That’s the way things go these days: win the X Factor; score the Christmas chart-topper. Right?
It’s pretty much old news that a Facebook campaign has been started up to get ‘nineties rap-metal classic ‘Killing in the Name’ by Rage Against the Machine to number one instead of Simon Cowell’s winner. Hell, not even the concept is new – there was a similar (and ultimately doomed) campaign last year to get Jeff Buckley’s ‘Hallelujah’ (why not the original Cohen version?, was always my thought) to the top spot rather than Alexandra Burke.
I’d still quite like it to happen, though, if I’m being honest. I don’t even like ‘Killing in the Name’ (Rage… are one of those “seminal” bands whose appeal has always passed me by), but I really, really don’t like X Factor.
There’s been a pretty broad spectrum of reaction it this year, though. Simon Cowell has dismissed the campaign as “stupid”, claiming that not having a Christmas number one will hardly ruin his life. he’s got a bit of a point, actually – it is a little bit like the kind of thing a stroppy teenager would do after being sent to their room; even the “fuck you, I won’t do what you tell me!” lyrics have that ring to them.
Other people have pointed out that Rage Against the Machine are – like Cowell’s acts – contracted to Sony, and so getting them to number one would hardly be a gesture of defiance towards The Man.
Facebook have, without giving their reasons for doing so, closed the group down this morning – by the point they did so, it had around 750,000 members. Not that it did a lot of good, seeing as another, “back-up”, group has sprung up in its absence, currently numbering over 85,000 members after not very long online at all.
The thing that’s surprised me most, though? The fact that on Saturday, bookies slashed the odds of ‘Killing in the Name’ getting to number one this Sunday down to just 3-1. People are actually beginning to think upon the idea with some credulity.
So, will it happen? Let’s be honest, probably not. But it’s still fun – if somewhat childish – to try, eh?