System on the up?

January 14, 2010 at 9:06 pm | Posted in music | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

In the grand modern-day tradition of bands refusing to stay split up for long, it’s been rumoured that System of a Down are set to reform.

On Tuesday, the band’s bassist, Shavo Odadjian posted on his Twitter account: “Are u guys ready for System???”

The answer, of course, being “hell yes”. I am genuinely quite excited at this possibility. System of a Down are one of the bands which defined my teenage years, as I’m sure they did for many others. Musically diverse, they managed to mix heaviness, melody and almost angelic harmony with often batshit-crazy-sounding lyrics. They were unpredictable and sounded like nobody else at the time; you can clearly trace their influence in the likes of early Biffy Clyro. They were also articulate and outspoken about politics, and introduced many (myself included) to subjects such as the Armenian Genocide.

Here’s a reminder of exactly why SOAD were so incredible – fantastically tribal drumming, ever-building harmonies and a chorus to die for:

Even though they arguably peaked with 2001′s frankly awesome Toxicity, I was still pretty disappointed when they went “on hiatus” (does nobody ever admit to having split up these days?). Being only about 13 when I first got into them, I never got the chance to see them live: sadly, growing up in Exeter didn’t offer much opportunity nearby. I managed to catch some of Serj Tankian‘s solo set at Reading 2008, and I’d love to finally get the chance to see the whole band. Fingers crossed, yeah?

Sadly, Shavo now seems to be backpedalling somewhat (or so Xfm have interpreted, anyway): “About my “are u guys ready for System?”. I’m not sayin we are back but, if so? U guys ready? SoRry for gettin u guys amped. I’m just seeing”

However, given that BBC 6Music can announce stories “broken” on decidedly dodgy-looking Twitter accounts (all the links to this have now disappeared, but they claimed that MoF had announced they were working on a new album on a rather non-official-looking Conor Oberst Twitter account), I’m going to carry on getting my hopes up.

After all, “I’m just seeing” sounds like there’s definite scope to me.

Fare thee well, 2009

January 3, 2010 at 5:26 pm | Posted in music | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Alright, so I’m a few days late on this one. And I’ve not updated in a while, I know. I said I’m sorry, though, ‘kay mum?

Anyway, aware as I am that this is a trite and overdone send-off to the music of the past year, I couldn’t quite let 2009 slide into oblivion without so much as a kiss goodbye. I’ve already posted about my album of the decade, and I’m not going to bother putting them into any particular order of merit. Instead, I’ll just keep it chronological.

My somewhat-reluctant mentor, Huw, termed his list of albums of the decade ‘Well, *I* Like It’. I plan on using the Huw Davies defence here to shield myself against any criticisms that these are not the best albums of the year. They’re my favourites and this is my blog, so shut up.

Emmy the GreatFirst Love

I’ve got a confession to make: it may not be in vogue to say it, but I’m not that keen on the current crop of new female singers, as a rule. The appeal of La Roux, Florence, Paloma Faith et al just sort of passes me by. But obviously there are some exceptions – after all, what is quite possibly my favourite album of last year was made by a female singer. First Love certainly features my favourite track of the year, in the glorious title track:

It’s gorgeous, from the near-a cappella start to the build-up of the military band-esque drumming. Hell, I don’t even mind that it borrows from Leonard Cohen’s ‘Hallelujah’. Part of what makes this album so stunning is its honesty; it feels almost like an open letter to an ex. Yet, weirdly, this intimacy doesn’t render it impenetrable: if anything, there’s something in the lyrics that everyone can relate to. I can practically guarantee that much of this album will send your thoughts back to that one person – and pretty much everyone has one tucked away among the pages of their past – that was that bit harder to let go of than anyone else.

Fragile and delicate, yet packing an unexpected bite in Emmy’s crystal-clear vocals (sample: “And I would suck the life from you if there was any left to suck/And I would love you if you told me there was something there to love…I would marry you for money but I don’t suppose you’ll ever have enough”), this is packed with simple yet affecting songs. I’m not sure I could love this album much more if I tried. If only all break-ups could sound this good.

Regina SpektorFar

Is it just me, or has Regina Spektor crept into common consciousness almost by stealth? I know tons of people who adore her, yet I never seem to hear her getting much airplay. No matter. Her fifth album still features her familiar kookiness, but is also slightly more refined. That said, she does impersonate a dolphin on ‘Folding Chair’. It’s actually quite sweet.

‘Dance Album of the ’80s’ is an obvious highlight – taking its time to unfurl an almost unbearable lovely climax:

The tracks are still largely character-led, but the piano accompaniments are rippling, rather than raging, and grant the vocals and strings precious room to breathe. Growing up without growing boring? I like it, rather a lot.

Slow ClubYeah So

Criminally, I didn’t get into Slow Club until September, when I was sent to review them for Big Issue Cymru - but I was an instant convert. The idea of The White Stripes (standard musical comparison for a two-piece act), Bright Eyes and Belle & Sebastian having a cosy chat over a cup of tea with three sugars probably doesn’t sound too great, because it sounds rather twee. And twee’s not cool these days, yeah?

Twee may have a bad name, but this duo show that this isn’t really justified; they’re two impossibly cute people making impossibly cute songs. There’s also quite an impressive variety, given that the main tools here are acoustic guitars, pared-down drums and boy-girl harmonies, but the quiet regret of ‘There’s No Good Way to Say I’m Leaving You’ sits pretty alongside the carnival-esque romp of ‘It Doesn’t Have to Be Beautiful’:

Possibly not everyone’s cup of sugary tea, but most certainly mine.

Monsters of FolkMonsters of Folk

Yes, I know I’ve blogged about the brilliance of this motley crew before, but I probably won’t stop until I’ve got the majority of the world (or at least of my friends) convinced. Yet another Conor Oberst-related project – who’d've thunk the kid had it in him? (Okay, quite a lot of people.)

I’m not normally a fan of an Oberst project in which he partially relinquishes control of the microphone, but when the other artists involved are of such a high calibre as Jim James/Yim Yames and M. Ward, who can complain? Style-wise, this is – as the title may suggest – pretty much a straight-up collection of folksy tracks; there aren’t really any curveballs on this record. The quality, though, is what makes MoF stand out. Plus, it features ‘Ahead of the Curve’, which is an incredible three-and-a-half minutes of sheer, gleeful optimism:

Despite having multiple vocalists, this feels like a brilliantly coherent album, perhaps because it’s grown organically, having been pipeline since 2004. Big-hearted and born of four prodigious talents, I’m just hoping it’s not another five years before more MoF material surfaces.

In defiance of the support act

November 17, 2009 at 2:03 pm | Posted in music, Uncategorized | 6 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Let’s be honest: support acts are mainly rubbish, aren’t they? There  are very few that I’ve seen that have converted me, The Sleepy Jackson and The Subways being among them.

Last night I saw something quite remarkable: a gig with no support act. Monsters of Folk at the Coal Exchange, who took the stage in their three-piece suits looking for all the world like the house band straight from an American Gothic novel; perhaps something imagined up by Edgar Allan Poe.

(I wish I had an original image to use here, but there was a strict no-camera policy)

Obviously they were fantastic; that pretty much goes without saying for anything which has Conor Oberst’s involvement. But no support act? Controversial choice, arguably.

There tend to be two camps of opinion when it comes to support acts: some think that they’re just a way of making the headliners look good; others think that they’re a valid way of introducing audiences to other, lesser-known bands.

I’m sure that many would claim that forgoing one altogether is a colossal act of ego. Personally, I think that it was the complete opposite in this case.

Monsters of Folk feature members of Bright Eyes (Conor Oberst and Mike Mogis), My Morning Jacket (Jim James) and M. Ward (well…) – they’ve got more than enough talent between them not to need someone to make them look comparatively good.

Not showcasing another band? Less defensible, perhaps. But MoF literally played a three-hour set. This set included at least seven Bright Eyes songs, as well as plenty of My Morning Jacket and M. Ward material. This simply wouldn’t have been possible if time had had to be allowed for another band’s set.

Supergroups‘ (God, I hate that term, hence the inverted commas) can sometimes be frustrating because of a refusal to acknowledge that many in the audience will be there as a result of their admiration for the component bands. “Hey, we’re playing in a different band, now; you’re not meant to be here for anything else,” can sometimes go the logic.

And that, I think, is a far worse.

Lovely.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.